Nanban Visitor Review & Analysis

PUBLISHED DATE : 25/Jan/2012

Nanban Visitor Review & Analysis

Nanban - A Visitor Review and Analysis

by Kannan Vijayakumar


After Endhiran, many would have expected Shankar to come up with another epic venture. But, he shocked us by his decision to choose a Hindi blockbuster, 3 Idiots to remake. He went through many months just to fix the casting and location, ensuring not to distort the original masterpiece. Does Spielberg of Kollywood meet the high expectations?


Overview


Majority of us know the story of 3 Idiots and Shankar has decided not to tweak any of the scenes, keeping about 98 percent of the original screenplay in Nanban. Even the framing of the some scenes are very similar to the original. So therefore, the impact of Naban is very close to the original product. Shankar has played safe and that have resulted in a desirable product. The casting is perfect and the whole team have worked to bring a clone of the original here and have succeeded. The original flavour is evident at every department of the film eventually settling safely as an honest remake.

 

Contrast and Compare  (Nanban v 3 Idiots)


Even though comparisons are unavoidable, Shankar has wisely crafted a product which will match with the original in almost all aspects. This comparison is not to see which is superior but to show the novelty of both films in their own ways.


Casting

Character List

Analysis

Vijay as Panchavan "Pari" Pariventhan

(Originally played by Aamir Khan as Ranchhoddas "Rancho" Shamaldas Chanchad)

 

Vijay as Pari is one of the wisest choice of Shankar as the actor easily settles on the role. He brings out the charm and liveliness of the character by the energetic dialogue delivery. His timing and expressions creates the desired effect. Vijay adds on his own style to character but sometimes, subconscious or consciously imitates Aamir Kahn at some scenes. But to look at it in another view, this can be a decision by the team not lose the flavour of the already famous character. In Overall, Vijay is given a chance to boast his versatility in this film and have grabbed it firmly.

 


 

Srikanth as Venkat Ramakrishnan

(Originally played by R.Madhavan as Farhan Qureshi)

Srikanth is the second most experienced actor among the three and have stamped his comeback hard with this film. He does justice to the character of a student who is stuck in between parent’s desires and his own ambition. He does exceptionally well during the scenes where he convinces his father. What makes the character unique is the own rendition and style he added. However one could miss the innocence and sympathetic look carried by Madhavan in the original. In overall Srikanth is an apt choice.

 


 

Jeeva as Sevarkodi Senthil

(Originally played by Sharman Joshi as Raju Rastogi)

Jeeva is the most look-alike cast from the original and a great choice by Shankar. Jeeva does a great job and his comic timing is excellent. He is convincing for the role and surprisingly, he looks more convincing in many scenes than what was done in the original by Sharman Joshi. In overall the best casting among the trio.

 


 

Sathyaraj as Virumandi Santhanam (Virus)

(Originally played by Boman Irani as Viru Sahastrabudhhe (Virus) )

Sathyaraj easily shows his experience by his dynamic presence who believes that life is a race and getting good marks/grades is the only victory in life. His looks are the major plus point of the character and Shankar has creatively designed him to get the desired effect. His combination with Vijay is enjoyable. However he imitates Boman Irani at many place and his natural looks get lost in this. That could be avoided as a veteran like him could have easily managed to bring in the desired impact with his own style. But in overall, Sathyaraj impresses!

 


 

Sathyan as Srivatsan (Silencer)

(Originally played by Omi Vaidya as Chatur Ramalingam (Silencer))

This is a cast which Shankar took almost 3 months to decide and was even at the verge to cast Omi Vaidya from the original. But the search was worth it as Sathyan impresses and one could wonder where this talent was all this years. His English renditions and voice add value to the character. This is the only character probably in the film which is not very close to the original and was allowed to experiment by the actor. Especially in the stage speech scene, Sathyan steals the show. In overall, Sathyan has crushed all the questions raised by skeptics.

 


 

Ileana D'Cruz as Ria Santhanam

(Originally played by Kareena Kapoor as as Pia Sahastrabudhhe)

Illeana after a 5 year break (last seen in Kedi) have returned back with this prestigious project to make her presence felt. She excels well with the right charm and bubbliness which the original character has. Special mention to actress Andrea for dubbing for her. Her chemistry with Vijay is excellent and adds value through a competent performance. However her performance in the climax scenes did not match Kareena Kapoor, which brings her down a little in comparison. Besides these small slip-ups, Illeana is just fine.

 


 

S.J. Suryah as Panchavan "Pari" Pariventhan

(Javed Jaffrey as The real Ranchoddas Shamaldas Chanchad)

 

 

S.J. Suryah, complex look and comical dialogue delivery have always been criticized by many but Shankar has turned this to qualities favouring the role. He impresses with his sympathetic look and animated body language. He does look more comic relief than the original character and of course underplays too which creates a good impact. In overall a good choice for even a brief role.

 


 

 

 

Screenplay & Dialogues


As mentioned earlier, Shankar has played safe by not tweaking any scene from the original. However, he could have altered some scenes from original. The dialogues by Madhan Karky and Shankar are witty and have excellent comical timing. Even though most of the content is borrowed from the Hindi version, it is very difficult to avoid the temptations of going overboard. Kudos for showing the restraint and doing it exceptionally well.


Music


Harris Jeyaraj and Shankar have already proved their success in Anniyan. All the songs have been placed very well with the film and has been complimented by the Director of the original, Rajkumar Hirani. Especially the tune of ‘En Frienda Pola’ song has been used as a theme music which is soothing to the ears. The heavy use of guitar for the BGM really suits well. However it is very obvious that Irukkana song is placed to satisfy Vijay fans, expecting a fast number before the climax. It is refreshing to see fresh graceful dance steps by Farah Kahn for a fast number like this. 


Technical Departments


Camera work by Manoj Pramahamsa gives a fresh look to the film and his bird’s eye view shots and soft lens gives a feel good factor especially in Asku Laska song, he proves his mettle. His work is undoubtedly a strength to the film. Art Direction has always been a platform which Shankar show cases his creativity and he has done it this time too. He has worked in well with art director Muthuraj to give his own touch of colourful accessories in the ‘All is Well’ song differing from the original. One could feel that the Tamil version has a fresher look than the original. He had also utilized ‘Irukkana’ song completely to fulfil his desire for grand sets. ‘Asku Laska’ song having a tribute sets to his previous film songs are very innovative (Sets resembling Kumari from Anniyan, Kannum Kannum from Anniyan, Sahana Saral from Sivaji and Rendakka from Anniyan). Editor Anthony who is known for fast cuts has tried to go slow for this film. For a movie running 187 minutes, no scene looks draggy. 

 

Verdict


All said and analyzed, one question will always be lingering regarding the decision by Shankar for doing a frame-by-frame remake, especially from a man who took Indian cinema to another level with his creativity and hardwork. In Nanban, his trademark is only visible in songs and set designs. Shankar was clear from the beginning not to distort anything from original. That brave decision has to be respected for putting all the cinematic temptations and staying honest to the original film. 

 

Overall, Nanban is a safe but a successful gamble.

Visitor Rating: 4/5

User Comments