Madha Gaja Raja (U)
12/Jan/2025 Action, Comedy

%
Rate It:

Critics: 5 Panel: 3 User: 384

Overall: 3.7 from 392 users

Madha Gaja Raja
close
To write your own review about this movie

Add Review

Videos

Photo Gallery

Critics Review

3.00

A Fun Time-Pass Family Entertainer!

Madcap ride in which the humour clicks big time. Despite the regular storyline, dummy villain and absurd heroine roles, the film comfortably manages to engage by delivering a truckload of clap-worthy comedy segments.(more)

Source: Ashwin Ram, MovieCrow

3.00

A self-aware, largely entertaining throwback

Having cut his teeth with entertainers targeted at every section of the audience, the director also mixes up comedy with romance and action, so this keeps things moving. Madha Gaja Raja might not rank among his best works, Ullathai Allitha and Kalakalappu, but this is still an OG film that deserves ...(more)

Source: Suganth, Times Of India

2.50

Vishal, Santhanam power this Sundar C throwback to simpler yet sus times

But deep down in your heart, do you actually think it would have been the case? But one thing is for sure, whatever happens, however tough it gets, the film might still be hilarious, offensive, glamorous, and fast-paced because for over three decades one man has always managed to have the last laugh...(more)

Source: Avinesh , Indian Express

2.50

Vishal, Sundar C's film takes you on a nostalgic ride

The heroines in Madha Gaja Raja - Anjali and Varalaxmi Sarathkumar, are there to pander to the male gaze. Their roles don't have much agency either. Madha Gaja Raja, even though outdated and politically incorrect, manages to bring much-needed laughs as it reminds you of the good old days when all...(more)

Source: Janani, India Today

3.00

Vishal, Sundar C's fun, largely engaging throwback to masala cinema of the past

Madha Gaja Raja isn�t the film itself, but the mindless fun of watching something that as a whole could only exist in your past. It�s nothing more than a could-have-been that has somehow become a has-been.(more)

Source: Bhavanesh Chander, The Hindu