Login/Sign Up
Critics Review
1.50
For two hours, this movie seems like a complete waste if you were looking to satiate your frightful taste buds.
1920 London is the third instalment of the franchise and I hope the last one. A complete failure in scaring, startling or even racing your hearts for that matter.(more)
Source: Surabhi Redkar , Koimoi
2.50
1920 LONDON is an engrossing fare with the right amount of eerie and scary moments.
1920 LONDON is an engrossing fare with the right amount of eerie and scary moments. It has its ample share of terrifying moments that one expects from a film about supernatural forces. It has the potential to appeal to all sections of audiences at the box-office.(more)
Source: Bollywood Hungama News Network, Bollywood Hungama
1.00
1920 London is just BLAH!
Sharman Joshi has been trying to experiment with different kinds of films but his strategy doesn't seem to be working. He is a terrific actor but needs to very cautious while choosing scripts. But if Sharman wasn't in the film, 1920 London would have been a very painful ride. (more)
Source: Namrata Thakker., Rediff.com
1.00
A witchy love triangle
�1920 London� is a clear miss this week. The couple making out in the dark beside me was perhaps more entertaining than the film.(more)
Source: ROHIT BHATNAGAR, Deccan Chronicle
1.00
Director Tinu Suresh Desai redeems himself only because he gives us enough things to laugh about. There are corny dialogues that provide some comic relief. And the visual of a flying Sharman ala Shaktiman, will have you in splits. Clearly, the actor sleepwalks through his role and a good pay cheque seemed like his only impetus to see this through the end. Meera is abysmal and the rest of the actors with their grim voices are not worth mentioning. (more)
Source: Mohar Basu, Times Of India